Search for: "#evans, in Re" Results 1861 - 1880 of 1,979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
At its September 30, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act, the constitutionality of Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute, protections on free speech interests of government employees, and a free exercise challenge to workers’ compensation requirements. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 13204-21 A man v Doncaster Free Press, 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 13207-21 Studholme v Mail Online, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 28 April 2022, a statement in open court was read at the High Court in the phone hacking claim brought by Dr Evan Harris, a former Hacked Off Director, Liberal Democrat… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
The police report further indicated that Piontkowski was going to re-interview plaintiff and then forward the matter to the New York State Insurance Frauds Bureau. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Hold the Front Page reports that hundreds of copies of a Scottish newspaper, the Dumbarton and Vale of Leven Reporter, had to be re-printed after publishing a picture of the wrong man next to a story about a convicted sex offender. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:46 am by David Lat
In yesterday’s post about the departure of D.C. power broker Lanny Davis from McDermott Will & Emery, a firm he joined a little over six months ago, we put out a request for more information. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:32 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:48 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:33 pm by Jarod Bona
Bona Law filed an antitrust lawsuit on behalf of our client in the Northern District of Georgia alleging antitrust violations in the cement and ready mix concrete markets. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Post-Seattle Cases That Eclipsed Seattle’s Essence So if Justice Kennedy’s (re)reading of Seattle is less than convincing, is there a way to justify his bottom line? [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Meghan Conroy
Rather, he says, investing in a healthier, pluralistic media environment is the way forward; he argues that an “expansive nonprofit media sector, like the ones we see in other major Western democracies, could temper the narrowcasting excesses of the commercial media sector and help re-normalize professional news practices and values across the entire US media ecosystem. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
A statement from Rahman Lowe Solicitors, who represented Cage in its libel claim, said it had seen an email to an editor from the journalist who wrote the story raising concerns that “the below article was re-nosed in editing without consulting me to change the meaning of the top line”. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In November, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) held that Germany could lawfully censor an animal-rights campaign consisting of seven graphic posters analogizing animal exploitation and slaughter to the Nazi Holocaust. [read post]