Search for: "BARRETT v. STATE" Results 1861 - 1880 of 1,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2021, 4:22 am by SHG
He began, as so many do these days, with the Supreme Court’s shadow docket decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 9:24 pm by Josh Blackman
" Most people stopped caring about this issue once Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  That was certainly true of Wechsler’s essay, even though it was “merely” the Holmes Lecture at the Harvard School, funded by the Holmes Devise that the Justice left to the United States on his death. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
No court will go along with this today as stated. [read post]
15 May 2025, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
These scholars likewise ignore the rationale of the landmark 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
Barrett's book Glock: The Rise of America's Gun, the company aimed its initial promotions at the law enforcement market. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
”5 The site’s “Facebook Principles” state that a user may “set up a personal profile, form relationships, perform searches and queries, form groups, set up events, add applications and transmit information through various channels. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]