Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 1861 - 1880 of 191,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 9:22 am by sally
G v de Visser (Case C-292/10); [2012] WLR (D) 87 “Where it was impossible to locate the whereabouts of a defendant, European Union law did not preclude the issue of judgment by default in circumstances where the document instituting proceedings had been served by public notice under national law, provided that the court seised of the matter had first satisfied itself that all investigations required by the principles of diligence and good faith had been undertaken to… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:04 am by sally
Regina v C(S) [2012] EWCA Crim 6; [2012] WLR (D) 5 “At a retrial of a conspirator about whom the jury at the first trial had been unable to reach a verdict, the Crown would be entitled to tell the jury that it was the prosecution’s case that those who had been acquitted at the first trial were probably involved in the conspiracy and that the jury would be entitled to take into account the acquitted conspirators’ probable role in the importation when… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:28 am by lpbncontracts
I've been fiddling with my teaching materials this fall, substantially increasing the amount of time I devote to historical and theoretical materials, I've been juxtaposing "freedom of contract" cases like Lochner v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:55 am by CorporateAcquisitions MergerLawBlogger
It's been a busy day in Delaware - thanks to the wonders of the Internet and Courtroom View Network, I've been watching the Versata v Selectica appeal before the Delaware Supreme Court (yesterday) and the Yucaipa v Barnes & Noble... [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:55 am by Hull and Hull LLP
As has been my mantra all week, Justice Cromwell, who delivered the reasons for the Court in Kerr v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:57 am by Adam Levitin
There's been a lot of media coverage of the recent ruling of the NY Supreme Court (that's the trial court, not the final Court of Appeals) in MBIA v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm by Adam Levitin
We've already junked Price v Neal in the ACH context, where NACHA rules require that the ODFI warrants that the ACH entry has been authorized by the Receiver. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:04 am
Leonard volunteered to sit in on yesterday's status hearing in the USA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:15 pm by Andres
It has been described unimaginatively as trail-blazing, innovative, fun and informative. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:24 pm by Buce
I've often wondered what would have happened had it been the Catalans and not the Castilians and not the Catalans who had conquered Central and South America. [read post]