Search for: "Bates" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am by Laura Sandwell
For individual case details please visit the following: BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance , Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess Insurance… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:35 am by FDABlog HPM
Wasserstein – Loyal readers of the FDA Law Blog have followed (with bated breath) the saga of Vermont’s law that prohibits pharmaceutical and medical device companies from giving many items that are permitted under the PhRMA Code and AdvaMed Code. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Make sure the documents are Bates-stamped, and reference the number on the record. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:30 am by Tom B
Right now every member of the Board is putting tons of time into the IGDA without thanks or compensation…I am not bitching here…but I have spent most of my office time since I got back from GDC on IGDA stuff…and I know that Bob Bates has done nothing else as well. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Moral of story:  keep precise expense records.Including Bates numbers and confidentiality labels (not a category of taxable costs). [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The world of administrative law has recently been on tenterhooks, awaiting with bated breath the Court’s revival of the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
Making yourself desirable to your former firm is like Kathy Bates in Fried Green Tomatoes trying to seduce her husband while wrapped in Saran Wrap. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In a new episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “discuss recent grants, the Court’s debut into the digital age, and Justice Kagan’s recusal in a case that’s already been argued. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
His list of “substantial questions of law and fact” for the Wilkerson appeal includes: Consistent Brady Violations – Data Dump – Hiding Exculpatory and Relevant Evidence in more than 8 to 15 million Pages of Documents of Discovery as raised in several Pre Trial and Post Trial Motions; Juror Misconduct during Voir Dire, Trial and during deliberations; Denial of Transcripts as an Indigent Defendant for the purpose of Post Trial Motions and Proceedings, including, but not… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:45 pm
In this humble blogger's opinion (because I'm sure you're all waiting with bated breath to hear it), I suspect both sides decided not to pursue the case because it probably would've ended up making both parties look pretty bad. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by Benjamin Wittes
Back during the litigation before Judge Bates, the Times suggested (here and here) standards with which the Al-Aulaqi strike has largely complied–as well as the creation of a FISA-like structure to review the addition of citizens to targeting lists: The government could establish a court like the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorizes wiretaps on foreign agents inside the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In the latest episode of the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “talk with Jeff Rosen about his new book on William Howard Taft,” “discuss recent oral arguments and tackle the most pressing question of our time: is a hot dog a sandwich? [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:00 am by Eric Cooperstein
When SCOTUS declared in Bates v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:40 pm
Patent No. 7,398,051 to Bates; (vii) the finding that the accused products do not infringe claim 1 of the ‘945 patent; (viii) the finding that the accused products do not infringe the asserted claims of the ‘277 patent; (ix) the finding that claim 9 of the ‘277 patent is anticipated under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 10:17 am by John B. Palley
At the simplest core the what is to clear title to a decedent’s assets but that’s really just a quick answer and only part of the process. pro·bate /’prō,bāt/ noun 1. the official proving of a will. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm by Graeme Hall
– Dr Ed Bates March 21, 2011 1 Crown Office Row No more squatting? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:29 am by Benjamin Wittes
District Judge John Bates declined to rule on that claim, at the government’s request, since he granted the motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds—including standing. [read post]