Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 4,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus discusses the possibility of a constitutional amendment to overturn the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:46 pm
In a similar vein, a Washington state court of appeals in HTK Mgm't, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
Although he doesn't cite the case, we might best understand Justice Gorsuch's approach as rendering the DCC parallel to the Court's understanding of equal protection pursuant to Washington v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:22 pm
§ 18 (Northern District of California, case no. 3:22-cv-08991)DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:09 pm
In Nienaber v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
Dretke, and Snyder v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 12:45 pm
But the Central District of California in Yoon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
The editorial board of The Washington Times weighs in on Arab Bank v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he raises two sentencing issues. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Reports come from Peter Landers at The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) and Chris Johnson at Washington Blade. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Accord Wheat v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
” Briefly: At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Alan Morrison looks at Monday’s decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
McGhee and Hurd v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:57 am
The case is Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
Unless the next two Supreme Court appointees are strong opponents of racial preferences — a most unlikely prospect — the Court’s role since the 1978 Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
