Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 1861 - 1880 of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 4:28 am by Dan
The company has the means with which to pay the wages. b. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:52 am by Liz Dunshee
The proposal emphasizes that other shareholder approval requirements also would continue to apply: The Exchange notes that any listed company selling securities in a private placement that does not meet the Minimum Price requirement to a passive investor will remain subject to the shareholder approval requirement of Section 312.03(c) if such transaction relates to 20 percent or more of the issuer’s common stock. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 8:12 am by Public Employment Law Press
Such exemption shall not be granted to an enrolled member of an incorporated volunteer fire company, fire department or incorporated voluntary ambulance service residing in such county unless:  (a) the applicant resides in the city, town or village which is served by such incorporated volunteer fire company or fire department or incoporated voluntary ambulance service;  (b) the property is the primary residence of the applicant;  (c) the property… [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 8:12 am by Public Employment Law Press
Such exemption shall not be granted to an enrolled member of an incorporated volunteer fire company, fire department or incorporated voluntary ambulance service residing in such county unless:  (a) the applicant resides in the city, town or village which is served by such incorporated volunteer fire company or fire department or incoporated voluntary ambulance service;  (b) the property is the primary residence of the applicant;  (c) the property… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that during the class period the defendants misrepresented or omitted to disclose that: “(a) demand for products in DSG’s Outdoor segment was slowing faster than defendants represented, resulting in excess inventory; (b) the ‘structural changes’ that defendants repeatedly touted, including differentiated products, improving pricing technology, and more efficient clearance channels, did not allow the Company to manage its excess… [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:30 am by Chip Merlin
He seems inclined to my conclusion: Where Coverage "B" involved an educated guess, Coverage "C" is devoid of any readily apparent avenues of educated information. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:30 am by Chip Merlin
He seems inclined to my conclusion: Where Coverage "B" involved an educated guess, Coverage "C" is devoid of any readily apparent avenues of educated information. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:20 am by Thalia Kruger
E.g. according to the AG, the mere crossing of a territory (transit operations) will, as a rule, not meet the requirement of a sufficient connection, whereas posting drivers from transport company A to B to work in and from the premises of transport company B gives a good indication of a sufficient link. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:39 am by Ted Allen
“We believe that taking this approach as to who constitutes a ‘record’ holder for purposes of Rule 14a-8(b)(2)(i) will provide greater certainty to beneficial owners and companies,” the staff said. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm by J. Ross Pepper
§48-249-115(i)(1)(A)(B) and (C) prevents, among other situations, a majority member who has been found liable in an LLC derivative action from using LLC assets to pay the judgment against him or her. [read post]
Now, under the California Court’s new “ABC Test” for determining worker status, hiring entities classifying workers as independent contractors must be able to prove that such workers: a) are free from the control and direction of the company in connection with the performance of the work, both under the applicable contract for the performance of the work, and in fact; and b) perform work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and… [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 11:04 am by Mark J. Levin
  Under the new rules, the following filing fees are payable by businesses in “multiple consumer cases”: (a) $300 per case for the first 500 cases; (b) $225 per case for cases 500 to 1,500; (c) $150 per case for cases 1,501 to 3,000 and (d) $75 per case for cases 3,001 and beyond. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:26 pm by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
This has also the effect of misleading the consumer as to the true origin of the product and of taking undue advantage of the reputation of the products covered by the PGI.Hence, infringement under both Arts. 13 (1)(b) and (d) was established.CommentUntil now, the evocation cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have covered identical products and never discussed whether it would be applicable to non-comparable ones.In C-4/10 and C-27/10 (which did… [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Proposal: clickthrough policies designed to educate the public, maybe choices. 1A shouldn’t be a barrier to regulation b/c the use for endorsement is commercial speech. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
(D) Both (B) and (C).The Court of Appeal held that the correct answer was (D). [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:22 am by Larry
Thus, the Court found that the exclusive penalty for the late shipments was to relieve C&B, i.e., the importer, of the freight expenses it normally would have incurred for timely shipments. [read post]