Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Sentencing Memo., United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
The “next” US Supreme Court term has already started; although the Court traditionally begins its term on the first Monday in October, this month had oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
For hundreds of years, courts have been there to protect citizens from harm. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
The case is called State of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The stakes for the outcome of Citizens United and the McCain-Feingold law have been raised after the D.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:03 am
See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, C/O Office of General Counsel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
The threat of increased costs does not necessarily increase the incentive for the infringer to bargain, but rather it increases the amount the infringer is willing to pay. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
What Does All This Mean? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Balkanization also covers this past Saturday's Washington Independent article on Senator Jim DeMint's opinion on the constitutionality of social security and health care reform; Balkin points to the Court's 1937 decision in Steward Machine Company v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– new process regarding ‘essence of the invention’ publication (America-Israel Patent Law) Israel restores Australian Patent office’s kashrut certificate (The IP Factor) (America-Israel Patent Law) Whose invention is it? [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Supp. 2d at 349 (holding that subsection (a)(1) does not require reliance, but (a)(2) does); Gilbert, 454 F. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:31 am
Why does copyright matter? [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:31 am
Specific Jurisdiction on Appeal: Does a Recent Decision from the Third Circuit Beg Further Review? [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:19 pm
(Shames-Yeakel v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:46 pm
It notes that the company’s acceptance of liability does not apply to lawsuits if they were filed before June 10. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
Vedachalam v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 11:35 pm
And if Michigan does, I suspect other states do, as well. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 12:42 pm
Further, the test as to whether confusion has occurred is set down by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as per Case C-2511/95 Sabel BV v Puma AG [1998] European Trade Marks Report 1. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Schapiro announced two changes to the enforcement process at the SEC intended to “empower” the staff of the Enforcement Division. [1] First, Chairman Schapiro ended a two-year “pilot” program, implemented by the prior Chairman, which required the Enforcement staff to seek prior approval of the Commission before negotiating a civil money penalty against a public company for alleged securities fraud. [read post]
