Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm
L. c. 266 § 30. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:20 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm
The presumption of diminished responsibility of youth in murder sentencing under Canadian law and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA): the case of R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
Bury would have succeeded on this ground of appeal if the circumstances were otherwise, but it wasn’t so they didn’t. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Mein v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am
Thus, the Thibodeauxes cannot show as a matter of law that Section 230(c)(1) would bar GCC’s participatory-liability claims. * Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
S. 278.93 is constitutional under ss. 7 and 11(d); the accused is not compelled to testify and, therefore, s. 11(c) is not engaged; there is no absolute rule against defence disclosure. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:16 pm
However, the Act provides that a "collective bargaining contract [that] specifically provides otherwise" prevails over a "civil service provision. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
C. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
C. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
That’s not the law, as the PragerU v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am
(A) dismiss an indictment or any other charging instrument; (B) grant acquittal or dismiss or otherwise terminate a criminal proceeding; (C) halt, suspend, disband, or otherwise impede the functions of any grand jury; (D) grant a motion to suppress or bar evidence or testimony, or otherwise exclude information from a criminal proceeding; (E) grant a writ of habeas corpus, a writ of coram nobis, a motion to set aside a verdict or judgment, or any other… [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
And yet it feels yucky: the manipulation isn’t tied to changing your decision from what you’d otherwise make, it’s something else. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
§ 27.005(c).Pickens v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
(d) If the latter option provides the answer to Question 2(c), what requirement should be imposed as to the size of the relevant portion of the public? [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d §§ 4.05[2][a]-[c], 27.01[1][c]; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 10, § 10.01[4].] ■ Angela Dawson, Applicant v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:31 am
This opinion, along with Ramirez, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 5:14 am
" 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d)(9)(A) and (C). [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:10 am
" (2) The court shall instruct the jurors that until their jury service is concluded, they shall not (a) discuss the case with others, including other jurors, except as otherwise authorized by the court; (b) read or listen to any news reports about the case; (c) use a computer, cellular phone, or other electronic device with communication capabilities while in attendance at trial or during deliberation. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Pina D’Agostino’s Directed Reading: IP Innovation Program course. [read post]
