Search for: "Day v Davis"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 17, 2008)Affirming dismissal of Black clerk's untimely race-based seniority/discharge claims; 300 day deadline for EEOC filing ran from loss of seniority (>300 days), not termination (Sampath v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
“An attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate [*5]cause of a plaintiff’s damages if ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence ‘the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action'” (Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50 [2015], rearg denied 27 NY3d 957 [2016], quoting AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
On the same day there was an application in the case of Todary v W1 Cars Ltd before the same judge. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
The trial is listed for 4 days. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
The attorney then prepared my Aunt's [w]ill and returned to the hospital the next day (November 8,2011) to have her sign it. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s definition of sexual harassment found in Davis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm
Davis. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Rodriguez kicked butt on the rights issue, but the remedy didn’t go nearly as well, due to Davis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:51 am
” Diaz v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:31 pm
McCleskey v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Based on Davies’ work, BYU Law Dean D. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
Massachusetts got it exactly right; Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:57 pm
(The case is Territory v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:59 am
Davis in 2016. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
On the same day there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
(TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Homax Products – Forum selection clause did not affect defendants’ 30-day removal window: Homax Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Appellate Division, Third Department Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021) petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am
Davies (App. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
On the same day Ouseley J gave judgment in the case of Traveller Movement v OFCOM ([2015] EWHC 406 (Admin) dismissing the judicial review application arising out of a complaint about Channel 4’s “Big Fat Gypsy Weddings” series. [read post]
