Search for: "Downs v State" Results 1861 - 1880 of 40,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
That standard is said to have two goals, to ‘reduce, if not annul altogether, divergences between Member States’, and to ‘highlight the (mis-)perceived freedom of several Member States when transposing EU directives into law’.If one is an unabashed fan of both the CJEU and the idea that the Common Market necessitates that all copyright laws be the same in that market down to every jot and tittle, then one would agree. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:17 am by SHG
The trial of the United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:46 am by Kendall Lowery
But the majority struck down Section 3205 because it was not “properly tailored”—that is, it only applies to local government employees rather than State government employees. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:45 am by Andria So
To avoid the same fate as the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan, which was struck down by the conservative Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Scott Burris
Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
  It appears now to be long past time for the cultivation of temperance in the exercise of administrative and political discretion; it may well be that the time has come when those who, once on the fringes of political life (left and right), believe that it is necessary to tear down the edifice of the state so that something better may be built on the ruins of the old. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm by Bona Law PC
No matter the cause of the trend, the Court found that Congress decided to “clamp down with vigor on mergers,” quoting U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Natale v. 9199-4467 Quebec Inc., 2023 WL 4850531, No. 21-CV-6775 (JS)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 10:48 am by Vera Eidelman
In 2011, the Supreme Court struck down a state law that prohibited the sale or rental of violent video games to minors — but allowed adults to purchase games for minors — on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Will Baude
Norfolk Southern, and break down the latest case captioned "United States v. [read post]