Search for: "EVANS v. US " Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 6:19 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  So I will set aside May 16, fully expecting to hear news from the long-awaited trial of Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:01 am by WSLL
Pearson of Hickey & Evans, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming; and Joel M. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Writing on “Lib Dem Voice”, Dr Evan Harris was more cautious describing the bill as “A good start, but much still to play for. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions In the New South Wales case of Bruce Haddon v Dominic Steele and Evan Batten Simpson J dismissed a defamation claim realting to email allegations of sexual harassment. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:35 pm by jak4
Browsing the list of subjects besides the general topic “Law” (5698 articles), users can find references assigned such subjects as: Administrative Law: 42 articles, including: Social science research on trial: use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:16 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Like Dreyfuss and Evans, Feldman focuses on the use of "pre-empt" in Bilski, arguing that "[i]n gene-related inventions, pre-emption problems can emerge ... in the context of attempts to tie up a natural phenomenon. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" This is very similar to the argument by Lemley et al. that § 101 is about claim scope, not gatekeeping.In Part II, Dreyfuss and Evans apply these ideas to patents on genetic diagnostics, which is a subset of what are often called "gene patents," and I will use the "gene patent" shorthand in this post. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
Events No events for next week have been reported to us. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Even so, as Hedigan J held in Evans v Carlyle [2008] 2 ILRM 359, [2008] IEHC 143 (08 May 2008): The clear implication is that there may be cases where the court should act. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
US Law and Media News Once again, this will be the subject of a separate post Events No events for next week have been reported to us. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:36 am by Marc DeGirolami
Yet that is precisely what the court did by a 9-to-0 vote in the 1997 case of Clinton v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your comments… [read post]