Search for: "Express Services Inc" Results 1861 - 1880 of 6,154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Dragonfly Express Inc., appealed an award of contribution entered against it and in favor of the defendant C.H. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 10:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The jury could have reasonably concluded that Watermark intended to use the term J-Mate to fairly describe or compare its own products and services, rather than to confuse customers. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
At The WLF Legal Pulse, Richard Samp describes recent developments on remand in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   AT&T, Inc v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:17 am by Richard S. Zackin
Or the parties might agree to some other process, so long as they express in some fashion what that process is. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm by Alexander Berengaut and Tarek Austin
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule “A,” an owner of eyewear brands brought a Lanham Act action against hundreds of defendants alleged to infringe on its trademarks via a thousand domains and 50 online marketplaces.[9] Just over a week later, Luxottica obtained from the court an order mandating that domain-name registries transfer the defendants’ domain names to Luxottica.[10] The order further instructed a host of third parties who… [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
WBH’s position that it was harmed by Express’s advertising wasn’t sufficient for exceptionality, even though Verisign, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:11 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Milenio Express, Inc., 2018 WL 5304570, Oct. 26, 2018, A-0255-17T2 This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 12:19 pm by Aaron Lancaster
HHS Health Insurer Anthem to Pay HHS Record $16M Anthem Inc., the U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:15 am by Leiza Dolghih
Va. 2004)(expressing skepticism that a CD key is a trade secret); Tryco, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:18 pm by Joan Barata
This shift is reflected in Recitals 46 and 47 of the new AVMSD, which explain that “(s)ince users increasingly rely on video-sharing platform services to access audiovisual content, it is necessary to ensure a sufficient level of consumer protection by aligning the rules on audiovisual commercial communications, to the appropriate extent, amongst all providers. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:57 am by John Jascob
” The court went on to explain: “… the costs of collecting and distributing market data can indicate whether an exchange is taking ‘excessive profits’ or subsidizing its service with another source of revenue, as the SEC has recognized” (citing an SEC concept release). [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:41 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Informed by Interleasing Inc. v Ontario (Minister of Finance), [2009] O.J. [read post]