Search for: "GOLDINGS V US" Results 1861 - 1880 of 1,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2007, 4:23 am
Nicolas Economou, CEO of H5, offers useful insights in response to a prior post about software v. lawyers and empirical testing. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:27 am
I have not seen published decisions on key words v Boolean v concept search; I think you are right that these issues come up but don’t generate written opinions. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Government Whistleblowers; Implications of Garcetti v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:00 pm
About the value of some unpatented gold-mining claims in Alaska that the United States took when it expanded the boundaries of Denali Park. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
Lemley and others have looked for mechanisms to add to the patent system, such as gold-plated and regular patents. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:49 pm
Perhaps the most interesting decision was Hurley v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
So next time you take those virtual gold pieces from some newbie avatar — New York says that’s conversion. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:13 am
  They might just find that all that glitters is not gold. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:13 am
  They might just find that all that glitters is not gold. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
In case you're just joining us, pull up a chair, and listen up (or scroll down the page): CHARNEY V. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
In case you're just joining us, pull up a chair, and listen up (or scroll down the page): CHARNEY V. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:39 pm
When Brian Boitano was in the Olympics,Skating for the gold,He did two sow cows and a triple lutz,While wearing a blind fold. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
In order to process things to the court, e-filing is becoming a new gold standard. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 4:38 am
Medimmune v GenentechThe IPKat's friends, nobly led by Edward Tomlinson (Frohwitter, Munich), have drawn his attention to the US Supreme Court [read post]