Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Amy Howe
United States and the possibility that “overcriminalization actually increases the commission of criminal acts, particularly by white-collar offenders. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm by Steve Vladeck
That question, in turn, became the dominant focus of the ten-minute argument by Assistant to the Solicitor General Zachary Tripp on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting Ross and the state. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:03 am by John Elwood
United States, 10–150, which presents questions about whether the Supreme Court has certiorari jurisdiction to review the court of appeals’ denial of a request for authorization to file a second or successive collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Collins v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
On the same day, Ginsburg attended a performance of “The Merchant of Venice” at Montclair State University and participated in a roundtable discussion of the Shakespeare play afterward. [read post]
United States, which set up a challenge to one of the exceptions to the double jeopardy clause. [read post]
United States, which set up a challenge to one of the exceptions to the double jeopardy clause. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm by David Oscar Markus
But not at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Before you issue such a First Amendment-shredding opinion as Holder, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:40 pm
Abstract: The Political Fourth Amendment builds on Justice Ginsburg’s recent dissent in Herring v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
” Thus, the recent United States Supreme Court decision on pay equity, Ledbetter v. [read post]