Search for: "Google, Inc"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 11,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2017, 7:31 pm
Shutterfly, Inc., No. 16 C 10984, 2017 WL 4099846, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 6:18 am
"Gimbutas, Carolina Valeria c/ Google Inc. s/ daños y perjuicios". 12/09/2017. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:10 am
Meta Descriptions, Reviewed The meta description is the short synopsis of a page or post that gets shown directly in the SERP’s listing of that page: Google and the Google logo are registered trademarks of Google Inc., used with permission. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
Enlarge / Eric Schmidt, former executive chairman of Alphabet Inc., in Paris in 2017. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm
The deal sets Facebook up as a more direct competitor to Google’s YouTube, the most popular destination online for listening to music. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Meanwhile, the U.S. government seems to be taking positions more favoured by companies such as Walt Disney Co. and Time Warner Inc., which are lobbying for stronger protections for copyright owners. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
US Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Complaint Against GAIN CapitalOnline trading services provider GAIN Capital Group LLC has secured a judgement in its favor on Friday, December 15, 2017, as a part of a copyright infringement case launched against it by Tibco Software Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Since the article blames Midland’s lawyers for their subpar performance (without naming them, of course, see Google Scholar version of the Madden opinion, if interested in their identity), and since it unabashedly promotes the vested interests of the banks and financial industry in maximizing extraction of money at high rates of interest from people that have fallen on hard times and cannot pay their debts, it seems only appropriate – in the interest of fairness and balance… [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Since the article bashes Midland’s lawyers for their subpar performance (without naming them, of course, see Google Scholar, if interested in their identity), and since it unabashedly promotes the vested interests of the banks and financial industry in maximizing extraction of money at high rates of interest from people that have fallen on hard times and cannot pay their debts, it seems only appropriate – in the interest of fairness and balance – to subject this industry… [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:38 am
(See generally 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:46 am
Google, Inc., No. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 6:32 am
Others included Cisco Systems, Apple, Google, Oracle and Genetech. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:37 am
Our Federal Court recently granted an injunction in Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
CVS Health announced plans to acquire Aetna Inc. for $69 billion. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
Secondly, it was announced that an “opt out” representative action had been commenced against Google on behalf of 5.4 million iPhone users. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm
Bleyer v Google Inc and Google v Trkulja get a mention in relation to their differing interpretations of the reasoning in Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corp & Ors[2009]. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am
iStock My research on Internet libel takedown orders has profited tremendously from the Lumen Database (formerly ChillingEffects.org), a website to which Google and others archive takedown requests. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 8:07 am
Google Inc., 2008 WL 818346 (N. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 1:30 am
This writer for one awaited the first application of the case, particularly in a jurisdiction that leans more towards free speech, and seems like the wish has been granted by the District Court of the Northern District of California only a few weeks ago.The case of Google LLC v Equustek Solutions Inc. concerns the same subject matter as the Canadian case. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:55 pm
In a current dispute between Google and a Canadian company over de-indexing a competitor, Google is doing everything in its power to avoid the court order. [read post]
