Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 68,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2022, 6:07 am
Abstract: While the Supreme Court regularly decides cases defining the limits of the criminal jurisdiction of tribal courts, when it heard United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In Geier v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Alameda Gateway, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:39 am
Review granted on the following specified issue: WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:45 am
Carballo v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm
That extension — considerably less than the added thirty days the states had sought — makes it more likely that the case, United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:31 am
In Herring v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:39 pm
On August 3, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion for the recognition of an arbitral award in the matter Continental Transfert Technique Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:48 pm
Again without having actually eyeballed the order, I understand that CAAF yesterday granted review of the something like the following issue:WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT FOUND THAT A PROVISION IN APPELLANT'S PRETRIAL AGREEMENT TO "WAIVE ALL WAIVABLE MOTIONS" WAS AN EXPRESS WAIVER THAT BARS APPELLANT FROM ASSERTING ANY CLAIMS OF MULTIPLICITY OR UNREASONABLE MULTIPLICATION OF CHARGES ON APPEAL.United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:49 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Diaz v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
DaimlerChrysler v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:49 am
This case involves an appeal by the State of Michigan from a federal grant of habeas relief to a state prisoner. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:49 am
This case involves an appeal by the State of Michigan from a federal grant of habeas relief to a state prisoner. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
In very general terms, Michigan state law protects drug manufacturers from liability in products cases unless the manufacturer defrauded the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
