Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Erin Miller
In the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse reflects on what she sees as the "aggressive move" taken by the Court to hear new oral argument in the campaign finance case Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm by David
  As an initial matter, TSCA “does not include chemical substances subject to other US statutes such as foods and food additives, pesticides, drugs, cosmetics, tobacco, nuclear material, or munitions.” Greenhouse gases are indeed subject to other U.S. statutes (i.e. the Clean Air Act); this was the gravamen of the Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 2:40 pm by admin
Writing for the 5-4 majority in the case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 9:21 am by Vicki Shiah
This endangerment finding is a direct response to the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
 If allowed to persist, such price volatility kills new investment and technological innovation, which are essential if we are ever to have any prayer of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to the levels President Obama and others have proposed. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am by Amelio The
Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v EPA - in which the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:32 am
  The requirements for environmental quality enhancement applications are defined in MPEP § 708.02(V). [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:04 pm
To be fair, the US Supreme Court opened the door for the EPA to make this move in its decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:43 pm by Dianne Saxe
It will also give important support to plaintiffs in climate change litigation, such as Connecticut v. [read post]