Search for: "Henry v. Henry" Results 1861 - 1880 of 3,704
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
(Will Baude) Yesterday I posted the amicus brief that I and a group of constitutional law scholars filed in the Court’s recess appointments case, Noel Canning. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:57 am by lennyesq
 Wish him well and, if you recognize the behavior, contact Lawyer Assistance Program at: LAWYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM or nysbalap@hushmail.com (confidential e-mail) Patricia Spataro, LAP Director    Henry Kruman, LAC Chair   [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:57 am by lennyesq
 Wish him well and, if you recognize the behavior, contact Lawyer Assistance Program at: LAWYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM or nysbalap@hushmail.com (confidential e-mail) Patricia Spataro, LAP Director    Henry Kruman, LAC Chair   [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:20 am
The title of the seminar is a reference to Saint Crispin's Day, and the Saint Crispin's Day speech from Shakespeare's Henry V; in Henry V, Henry gave a rallying speech to the outnumbered English forces in the Battle of Agincourt. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:20 am by Carl Lietz
The title of the seminar is a reference to Saint Crispin’s Day, and the Saint Crispin’s Day speech from Shakespeare’s Henry V; in Henry V, Henry gave a rallying speech to the outnumbered English forces in the Battle of Agincourt. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
The United States Supreme Court recognized this principle in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]