Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2020, 11:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Please review these before sharing with your child so you feel ready to answer any questions they may have. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:07 am by Eric Goldman
After segregating minors, the services must then block minors from accessing content that “promotes, glorifies, or facilitates” the following content categories: (A) “suicide, self-harm, or eating disorders”; (B) “substance abuse”; (C) “stalking, bullying, or harassment”; (D) “grooming, trafficking, child pornography, or other sexual exploitation or abuse”; and (E) material that qualifies as obscenity for minors… [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:42 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 Some of this technology is classified for military R&D; other parts are not. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
If that application does not succeed, the child will end up in a removal proceeding in the Department of Justice’s Immigration Court, for a full asylum hearing before an immigration judge. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In particular, 4 NYCRR 5.3(b) provides, in pertinent part, that “If no effective date is specified in the resignation, it shall take effect upon delivery to or filing in the office of, the appointing authority. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In particular, 4 NYCRR 5.3(b) provides, in pertinent part, that “If no effective date is specified in the resignation, it shall take effect upon delivery to or filing in the office of, the appointing authority. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Flowers, Stetson University College of Law Speaker: Kristin B. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
However, ERISA section 4(b)(4) may exempt from ERISA coverage “plans maintained outside the United States primarily for the benefit of persons substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am by L. Julius M. Turman and Eric M. Walder
Each year, the California legislature – historically the most active of state regulators – reexamines the relationship between employers and their workforces and emerges with a multitude of employment law protections. 2015 was no exception. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am by L. Julius M. Turman and Eric M. Walder
Each year, the California legislature – historically the most active of state regulators – reexamines the relationship between employers and their workforces and emerges with a multitude of employment law protections. 2015 was no exception. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am by L. Julius M. Turman and Eric M. Walder
Through the progress of each year, the California legislature, which is historically the most active and expansive of state regulators, reexamines the relationship between its employers and their workforces to emerge with a multitude of employment law protections. 2015 is no exception, with lawmakers creating novel and expansive measures, all of which will affect companies throughout the state in varying degrees. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bexis
It is a poster child for the abuse of “cy pres” distribution in a class action settlement ? [read post]