Search for: "In Matter of Stewart"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
" Yonkers Police Commissioner EDMUND HARTNETT stated: "The issue of gangs and gang-related violence is not a local or regional matter. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 8:26 am
A juror like this will likely recognize a straight bias question, no matter how often it's asked and in how many varied ways, and pride himself on heading it off. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:03 pm
As the Supreme Court has reiterated time and again (albeit mostly in cases upholding statutes against Commerce Clause challenge), what matters is what Congress did, not the specific conduct of the individual challenging the statute’s constitutionality. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
" Yonkers Police Commissioner EDMUND HARTNETT stated: "The issue of gangs and gang-related violence is not a local or regional matter. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 3:10 pm
Even Jon Stewart had an opinion on it. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
" Yonkers Police Commissioner EDMUND HARTNETT stated: "The issue of gangs and gang-related violence is not a local or regional matter. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
Accordingly, Justice Reed remanded the matter to arbitrator to determine “the proper sanction” to be imposed upon Nicot, and said that Nicot's suspension was to be continued "pending reconsideration by the arbitrator. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
The case drew wide coverage from Pinsent Masons, Hill Dickinson, Clifford Chance, Bindmans and Stewarts. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:01 am
For example, we’d all agree with Thomas Jefferson and the Founders that we have a “right to pursue happiness,” but a right to happiness would be a different matter altogether. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
Don’t we know a student when we see one (to borrow a turn of phrase from Justice Potter Stewart)? [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
But after Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart took those roles, something changed. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Because they were ecclesiastical matters, the court would not review them. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
" Smith, 442 U.S. at 746 (Stewart, J., dissenting). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
”) Three Justices, though — Justices Douglas, Brennan, and Stewart, who were hardly corporation-loving extremists — would have ruled for the incorporated market, and thus must have concluded that the corporate ownership of the market was irrelevant. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
If they were not, it is likely that this was due to a lack of understanding of the law on the part of the homeowners or the police, who apparently considered these to be civil law matters. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:08 pm
As with all matters of the heart, you’ll know when you find it. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:47 pm
Potter Stewart, though, gave us what's understood to be the basic rule. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
In that case, someone named Stewart had a business disagreement with the plaintiff Shrader. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:07 am
In a 6-1 opinion written by Justice DeWine, in which Justice Stewart concurred in judgment only and Justice Donnelly dissented, the court held that because jeopardy never attached to the involuntary manslaughter charge in this case which was dismissed as part of a plea bargain, the double jeopardy prohibition did not prevent prosecuting Soto for murder or aggravated murder. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice Kennedy don’t see eye to eye very much, especially in matters regarding juveniles. [read post]
