Search for: "Individual Detention Detainers"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 9:32 am
There’s nothing mutually exclusive between the admirable goal of preventing torture from becoming U.S. policy, and the individual grievances of people who were arbitrarily detained and subject to abuse. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:17 am
The complaint alleges that the detainers violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments because DHS "fails to establish probable cause before issuing the detainers, does not notify individuals that detainers have been issued against them, and provides no means by which individuals can challenge their extended detention. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 9:42 am
The complaint alleges that the detainers violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments because DHS ”fails to establish probable cause before issuing the detainers, does not notify individuals that detainers have been issued against them, and provides no means by which individuals can challenge their extended detention. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
The Crown however continued to seek his detention on the tertiary ground which is where detention is justified in cases where the public would be outraged for an individual to be released. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
Generally, individuals can use reasonable force to resist an arrest. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Policies implemented by the US and Israel include targeted killing/drone attacks, Operation Cast Lead, and detainment of thousands of individuals in Afghanistan and Iraq, often for what can best be described as little, if any, cause. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:14 am
Policies implemented by the US and Israel include targeted killing/drone attacks, Operation Cast Lead, and detainment of thousands of individuals in Afghanistan and Iraq, often for what can best be described as little, if any, cause. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Nor is it of much effective assistance to those individuals detained as suspected terrorists and unable to access an effective review mechanism. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:30 pm
One lingering concern in Congress is that the original Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) passed in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks failed to create a framework under which to detain private individuals captured during military operations. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:10 am
Nor is it of much effective assistance to those individuals detained as suspected terrorists and unable to access an effective review mechanism. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:25 pm
You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:58 pm
Detention is not considered to be a criminal punishment, rather a coercive procedural method in criminal cases.If the Court decides to detain the accused, it sets forth the time limit for such detention. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
And there has been a great deal of attention too to individual judges on the court–particularly A. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
Gul and Hamad also contended that, as a result of their designation, they are subject under the laws of war to being arrested and detained again, and maybe even subject to being killed by the U.S. government. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Nafe and Torres currently are detained in the Metropolitan Detention Center awaiting transfer to federal custody. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:21 am
In mid-2010, the Tribunal issued its Rules of Procedure, and within a short time, six individuals had been arrested and detained by the authority of the Tribunal. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:20 am
There has been no investigation into claims of torture and abuse of individuals in detention.? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
Moreover, in Gillan the court “considered the breadth of the discretion conferred on individual officers under section 44 to be too great“. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
First, here's the one paragraph that the majority added to its original opinion (it begins on page 20 of the new slip opinion; the emphasis is mine): None of this means that the Executive Branch may detain or transfer Americans or individuals in U.S. territory at will, without any judicial review of the positive legal authority for the detention or transfer. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:25 am
According to the Guardian: It means the police have lost the power to detain or arrest someone for breaching their bail. [read post]
