Search for: "JONES v. STATE."
Results 1861 - 1880
of 6,826
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 9:30 am
As Justice Sotomayor highlighted in her United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:24 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 10:15 am
That's the allegation arising from offender accounts reported in Mother Jones. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:36 am
Consider State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:13 pm
A debate over the legacy of Lochner v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm
The parties and the justices for the most part took as common ground a discussion from Bank Markazi, suggesting (in Kagan’s rephrasing) that “if you had a piece of legislation that said in Jones v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:03 pm
BancorpSouth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:16 am
Crawford, a citizen of Texas, sued Allied, an Iowa Company and Jones, who is a Texas resident in State District Court. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:58 pm
Jones 17-537 Issue: Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments permit a state to fix the rates charged by a regulated entity at a level that precludes a fair rate of return on the regulated entity’s capital. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:20 am
The leading recent case in Kentucky is Jones v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:04 am
Carpenter is citing a more recent Court decision from 2012, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:00 pm
For more information, please see Stambovsky v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:48 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
As part of the appellant’s application to work as a teacher, the Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘SSHD’) issued an ECRC. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Stated otherwise, a plaintiff may not assert a claim that is entirely based on the expert’s prior testimony — and nothing more — but may assert a claim that is viable apart from, but supported by, that testimony (see De Lourdes Torres v Jones, 26 NY3d at 770 [precluding the subjection of a witness to potential liability for prior testimony [*3]”alone”]). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
See generally, Mescalero Apache Tribe v Jones, 411 US 145, 148-149; 93 S Ct 1267; 36 L Ed 2d 114 (1973) (“Absent express federal law to the contrary, Indians going beyond reservation boundaries have generally been held subject to non-discriminatory state law otherwise applicable to all citizens of the State. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Brown on Missouri v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:04 pm
” See Stewart v. [read post]
