Search for: "K. B. R."
Results 1861 - 1880
of 5,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 2:14 pm
Rule 60(b)(5) provides that a party may ask a court to modify or vacate a judgment or order if a significant change either in factual conditions or in law renders continued enforcement detrimental to the public interest. [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Mykytiuk Sean B. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:53 am
n en büyü? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:45 pm
Doch selbst wenn die Zuständigkeit nicht für das Rechtsbegehren, sondern für die Beurteilung der bewussten Vereinbarung zu prüfen wäre, bliebe das Ergebnis dasselbe, weil sich eine Gerichtsstandsklausel auch dann nicht auswirken könnte. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
Weiter besteht das Risiko, dass in erster Linie grosse Unternehmen wie Facebook und Google, aber auch Medienhäuser profitieren, denn sie können sich sowohl die aufwendige Bürokratie leisten als auch allenfalls erforderliche Einwilligungen von den Nutzern einholen. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:18 am
lunu büyüttü ve evlendirdi. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am
G1/97, Nr. 3 b) der Entscheidungsgründe, ABl 2000, 322).2. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am
G1/97, Nr. 3 b) der Entscheidungsgründe, ABl 2000, 322).2. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
R 13(3) EPC 1973 and A 175(3) EPC 1973). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Section 406(b) states: "The Commission shall revise its regulations concerning matters requiring prompt disclosure on Form 8-K (or any successor thereto) to require the immediate disclosure, by means of the filing of such form, dissemination by the Internet or by other electronic means, by any issuer of any change in or waiver of the code of ethics for senior financial officers. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:15 am
Für das Bündner Kantonsgericht gibt es bereits eine Kleiderordnung (Art. 18 KGV): Das Gericht muss dunkle Kleidung tragen, während für Rechtsanwälte und Parteien ebenfalls «korrekte Kleidung» vorgeschrieben ist. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As the time limit pursuant to R 159(1) EPC expired in the present case on 23 July 2008, the DA was validly filed on 22 July 2008.[4] The reasons in the appealed decision are mainly based on the grounds that:(a) the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 36(1) EPC includes the requirement that the parent application must be pending before the EPO; and(b) an international application which has not fulfilled the requirements of R 159(1)… [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 6:03 am
In December 2017, the son, B., who lived at the Manalapan property, deeded that property to a cousin, K. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
R 137(3), last sentence, EPC provides that no further amendment may be made without the consent of the ED. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 5:01 am
Second, several Code provisions, such as section 26(b)(2), 401(k)(8)(D), (m)(7)(A), 414(w)(1)(B), and 877A(g)(6), expressly refer to the section 72(t) additional tax by using the unmodified term “tax”. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
The EPO sent a notification pursuant to R 69(1) EPC 1973 dated March 16, 2006. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Current Status: 5/6/2015 - BILL AMENDED, House Public Utilities, (Fourth Hearing) ORC Sections: 1710.01, 1710.02, 1710.021, 1710.03, 1710.04, 1710.05, 1710.06, 1710.061, 1710.07, 1710.11, 1710.12, 1710.13, 1710.20, 1710.21, 1710.22, 1710.23, 1710.24, 1710.25, 1710.26, 1710.27, 1710.28, 1710.29, 1710.30, 1710.31, 1710.32, 1710.33, 1710.34, 1710.35, 1710.36, 1710.37, 1710.40, 4582.06, 4582.31 HB77 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (PATMON B) To require statewide registration of… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
Mas só faltou ela avisar a filha, Jaqueline, e a sobrinha, Kátia, de que elas também teriam suas vidas devassadas. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm
Es gehe um Leistungen, welche die Armee nicht mit eigenen Mitteln erbringen könne, welche aber für die Auftragserfüllung unabdingbar seien. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
(b) Is the answer to this question affected by either: (i) the possibility (and indeed the fact) of a request being made under A 122 for re-establishment of rights in the grandparent application following its deemed withdrawal, or (ii) the possibility of an applicant using R 69 EPC 1973 (see now R 112) to challenge the notice of loss of rights? [read post]
