Search for: "Levi v Levi"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 3:36 am
Remember Case C-462/09 Thiuskopie v Opus?]. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:31 pm
In Freeman Investments, LP v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Mager v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Mager v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand, supra, 6 Cal.3d at p. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
Consequently, compensation should be levied only on such devices, not on printers or plotters. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:04 am
Levis, supra. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Levi Distinguished Service Professor of Law at the University of Chicago. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
and Cadbury Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
This article from the LA Times notes that jeans maker Levi’s was quick to respond when it discovered its brand was discovered on pirate sites, taking steps with its global ad agency to prevent future ads from showing up on such sites. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
What will happen in the Warman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:38 pm
Par. 58 (quoting Sutton v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm
Levy’s Lexician Blog4. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm
Levy’s Lexician Blog4. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm
Levy’s Lexician Blog 4. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:03 am
The Ohio Supreme Court in Beaver Excavating Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:16 pm
Levi Strauss in Trademark Infringement dispute over “V” pocket design. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:59 pm
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
Off the top of his head, this Kat recalls these cases: Case C-467/08 Padawan (non-discriminatory 'fair compensation' through private recording levies); Case C‑569/08 Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (abusive .eu domain name registration); Case C‑20/05 Pubblico Ministero v Karl Josef Wilhelm Schwibbert (copyright royalty collection, affixing of marks and technical standards); Case C-376/22 Pie Optiek v Bureau Gevers,… [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:30 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]