Search for: "Little v State"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 26,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2024, 8:27 pm
In Blackmon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:03 pm
Evans prohibits an amendment to the California constitution to overturn a judicial ruling that the state constitution protects the right of same-sex couples to marry (and that resulted in same-sex marriages being performed in the state).For reasons I explained at the time, Reinhardt's approach in Perry makes little sense as an application of Romer. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 11:28 am
Here, as in [State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am
In Chevron USA v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
”, invoking the aftermath of Worcester v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:09 am
Ball State * Another School Violated a Stud [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:17 am
Yesterday, we posted most of the amici briefs in Sackett v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
The suspected caller was also in possession of a little less than $9,000 in cash. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Although the Court in Day v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
In Mallory v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:18 pm
Although the ruling is an important one for the rights of those accused of crimes the ruling is likely to have little impact in New York where State laws already gives defense lawyers the right to cross-examine scientific witnesses. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 4:14 pm
And totally agree both that the State's mistake here was inexcuable (which it forthrightly admits) and that it's not that great of a burden to say to a State, in esssence: "When the judiciary orders you to retry or release a prisoner within 60 days, and you don't, you can't just ignore the Order and continue to hold him; you've got to release him. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:22 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
Check the Carr v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
The Massachusetts statute authorizing the use of state forensic examiners specifically states that all reports produced by these individuals are sworn statements to be created “for the enforcement of law. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Contents include:Case CommentsHans van Houtte & Bridie McAsey, Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims Andrea Marco Steingruber, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Consent in Large-scale Arbitration Proceedings Céline Lévesque, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment Samuel Wordsworth, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Pre-conditions to… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:44 am
Essentially, the court restated old law that states an abstract idea is not patentable. [read post]
