Search for: "London v. State" Results 1861 - 1880 of 3,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2022, 9:49 am by Giles Peaker
The claimant had evidence from a surveyor valuer, stated to be based on (unspecified) ‘market evidence’. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Events Joining The Circle: capturing the zeitgeist of ‘Big Tech’ companies, social media speech and privacy, Inner Temple, London, Wednesday 23 May 2018. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm by Joanna Powis and Jonathan Lord
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
  Events 1 December 2016, Event: Internet & Social Media Law 2016, Grange Tower Bridge Hotel, London. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
An authority for this proposition was Bowater v NW London Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] IRLR 331, where Stanley Burnton LJ said: The appellant’s conduct was rightly made the subject of disciplinary action. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Ofcom, Transport for London (TfL) and Ernst & Young (EY) have confirmed they are the latest victims of the cyber-attack by Russian ransomware group Clop. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
At first instance, which was before either Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 or Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 were handed down, the District Judge did not consider proportionality at all and a possession order was granted.There was then an appeal to HHJ Simpkiss.Mr H “is a young man of 21 years old. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
At first instance, which was before either Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 or Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 were handed down, the District Judge did not consider proportionality at all and a possession order was granted.There was then an appeal to HHJ Simpkiss.Mr H “is a young man of 21 years old. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Charter 77 and the Human Rights in Czechoslovakia (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:12 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has said no to the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild’s (ACCG) request to challenge issues previously argued in the case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 7:29 am by David Markus
Supreme Court to hear arguments in the Kaley v. [read post]