Search for: "Look v. State" Results 1861 - 1880 of 41,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
Discussion This decision, like previous ones in Bezant v Rausing [2007] EWHC 1118 (QB): McBride v Body Shop Int Plc [2007] EWHC 1658 (QB) and Noorani v Calver [2009] EWHC 561 confirms that the Court will look carefully at claims in order to determine whether there is any real or substantial tort or that there would be any tangible or legitimate advantage to their continuance such as to outweigh the disadvantages for the parties in terms of expense, and the wider… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
Across the US, women’s health rights have been in a state of uncertainty since 2022, when the US Supreme Court decided in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:53 pm
I've warned for some time and I repeat the warning here again that this is only the first of many other suits that are being lined up by both the trial bar and state AG's looking into the issue of in house claims programs that compel policyholders or claimants to use a particular life market or limit choice through approved lists. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]