Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
The review group, headed by Lord McCluskey, was set up by Alex Salmond after the Supreme Court decisions in Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC24 and in anticipation of the decisions in HM Advocate v Ambrose, G & M. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:52 pm
George V lived closer to our own time. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Cusson v Quan 2007 ONCA 771). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 2:30 pm
In Meletios Apostolides v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Dille v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
” This refers to the judgment of the House of Lords in the Naomi Campbell case. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
The article merely stated that “questions were raised” about her due diligence. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
Issa and Others v Turkey; Bankovic and Others v Belgium and Others), but the facts in Al-Skeini - regarding the general state of affairs and the specific situations in which the shootings occurred - were not all that much stronger. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
State Comp. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Mark the name United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:36 pm
Chessman (34 P. 2d 679 (1959) at page 699) and People V. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
(s.2(2)) The test has been long-established, and was stated by Lord Diplock in Attorney General v English[1980] AC 116 at 141H-142C: If, as in the instant case, and probably in most other criminal trials upon indictment, it is the outcome of the trial or the need to discharge the jury without proceeding to a verdict that is put at risk, there can be no question that that which in the course of justice is put at risk is as serious as anything could be. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
And the cases the Court will hear this year are noteworthy—affirmative action, voting rights, and the "independent state legislature doctrine," among others.But because I'm not a very political person, I'm interested in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am
The Lord then confronted Eve, who immediately pointed the finger at the serpent: “And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
