Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
Isn’t that preempted, you ask? [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am
Were changes made while we weren’t looking? [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am
Many good things come in pairs, for example, shoes, ear plugs and twins, but sometimes even the best pairing won't be enough. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:18 am
Many good things come in pairs, for example, shoes, ear plugs and twins, but sometimes even the best pairing won't be enough. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(B), (C).) [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
Aug. 17, 2012), the defendant removed the matter, which involved an alleged drug overdose, to federal court. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:19 am
B. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:14 am
As long as the police didn’t lie and the grand jury indicted, according to Durham, there was nothing actionable in how the city behaved.The City of Durham: civil liberties capital of America.On matters related to civil liberties, I have a piece up at Minding the Campus on the remarkable (and deeply disturbing) reaction of UNC administrators to the recently-passed law boosting accused students' legal rights. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
” Similarly, Matt Bodie writes: Why wouldn’t the market’s reaction be a sign of this: (a) the AT&T/T-Mobile merger will give the new entity strong market power, (b) there are strong anticompetitive as well as efficiency gains from being bigger and having more market size, (c) the newly merged company would use that power to crush its weakest competitors, i.e. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
” In the [opponents’] view, claim 11 stated in essence that the point in time of adding the protease did not matter, and the combination of only two out of three possible points in time of adding the protease with the features of claim 1 represented a selection which was not derivable from the application as filed and which resulted in the addition of technical information. [11] In point 1.2.1 of its decision, the OD stated that “The presence of an alleged technical effect… [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 11:14 am
Or is this just a matter of doing something so we justify our budget? [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Decisions T 758/99 [2], T 890/00 [5, 4th §] and T 1182/01 [4.3] are examples where the Boards have left it to the OD to decide on apportionment of costs arising in subsequent first instance proceedings. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC, New York, NY (Gregory B. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC, New York, NY (Gregory B. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 10:28 am
That matters because 27 states use federal AGI as their starting point for taxation, while only six begin with federal taxable income. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
After him comes Jeremy B. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Section 100(b) provides that “[t]he term ‘process’ means process, art or method, and includes a new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 11:01 am
As set out in documents D12 and D20, two lots falling under the scope of the claim were assessed: lot B-1 (11,1 mg of water per ml of composition) exhibiting at least no better resuspendability than lot A (2.3 mg/ml) after 15 days and 3 months, and lot B-2 (21.0 mg/ml) exhibiting an even worse one. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:57 am
Symantec argued that she didn’t have standing because she didn’t allege that she viewed any specific ad or representation, but this didn’t necessarily matter under Tobacco II. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 am
First and foremost, there is the matter of the personal-or-household-activity exception. [read post]
