Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 5:44 am
Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and co-sponsored by the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Drug Policy Alliance, the William C. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Dunlap, Jr., Some Observations on Gabriella Blum’s ‘Fog of Victory’ Michael Walzer, Coda: Can the Good Guys Win? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 8:17 am
Thomas C Taylor v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:17 am
., Harvard and Northwestern — decided to get on the bandwagon while the getting’s good. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:07 am
Good luck! [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 10:45 am
Forkner of the Chicago Regional Office and supervised by Anne C. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:11 pm
Dunoff & Mark A. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:57 am
WhenU.com, Inc., 414 F.3d 400 (2d Cir. 2005), which held that no Lanham Act "use", and, thus, no actionable Lanham Act claim, exists for the use of a trademark in a keyword or metatag, where (a) the defendant does not place the trademark on any product, good or service, (b) it is not used in any way that would indicate source of origin, and (c) where defendant's use of plaintiff's trademark is strictly internal and not communicated to the public, as the use does… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
Good news for volunteer firefighters, bad news for people who use the roads.In Wisconsin, if someone drives through a red light and hits you, you generally have a right to have a jury decide who was at fault and what expenses the at fault party should pay. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
Reynolds provided evidence of mark strength; similarity of the parties’ packages; similarity of goods, marketing channels, and advertising; and Handi-Foil’s specific intent to make the packages look similar. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
On 12 October 2022, the General Court decided on the invalidity action by Shopify, Inc. against the EUTM for a number of goods and services in classes 9, 35, and 38 (T‑222/21). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
§ 1125(c). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
Alberto Bellan discusses the final judgment delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Union which invalidated the registration for a three-dimensional sign depicting a Rubik’s cube as being an infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of the Trade Marks Regulation , i.e. a sign which consists of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result and consequently, quashes the General Court decision of 25 November 2014, Case T-450/09 Simba Toys v OHIM. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
If you’re a 501(c)(3), you can help shape the future of the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:50 am
Noting that the Board of Appeal found the mark devoid of distinctive character, the CFI considered that it had to establish first whether the Board had shown that that mark was descriptive of those goods and services. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:35 am
In fact, the march we mark for its 50th anniversary was named the “March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
This was the first UK trade mark site blocking case and is the first site blocking case since Newzbin 2 to be contested by the ISPs. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:17 am
While we have what seems to be a pretty good system down, which includes no less than a clock radio with an old iPhone playing a noise app, two room fans, a range hood fan and bathroom exhaust fans, traveling can be more of a challenge. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Good news – in this case. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
The ECJ has today, in Case C? [read post]
