Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 1861 - 1880 of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
Applicant claimed acquired distinctiveness based on several years of use in the United States and sales representing some 17 million bars of soap, but the Board found the evidence insufficient. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 4:12 am
Applicant now offers a variety of goods in the United States under several LOTERIA-formative marks and owns a number of registrations, including one for LOTERIA for playing cards. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Cabranes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2017-2018. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:06 am
Opposer provided no evidence that applicant's mark closely approximates its name or identity (for example, United States Marine Corps, U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
That investigation is also far more complex in the United States than a quick examination of the organization of its government might suggest. [read post]
Case date: 19 October 2021 Case number: No. 2020-1196 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:02 pm
Name data are from Social Security card applications for births that occurred in the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]