Search for: "Park v. State"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 11,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2020, 6:38 pm
In R. v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:12 pm
That was enough to state a claim and keep the ADA claims alive. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:41 am
Revocable v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:53 am
Williams' decision yesterday in NuStar Farms, LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:24 am
The company is also facing an SEC investigation, is the subject of a class action lawsuit, and is conducting an investigation into possible wrongdoing by CEO Michael V. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am
Following the Advocate General’s opinion and the CJEU’s judgement in Pula Parking (C-551/15 – ECLI:EU:C:2017:193), the Court notes that ‘it is irrelevant that certain activities were carried out upon delegation from a State’ (para. 39). [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:20 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:00 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Los Altos denied the SB 35 application with a letter stating the project was inconsistent with parking standards, but without identifying the specific parking standards or any documents containing those standards. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
The site is owned by the federal government (government) and managed by the United States National Park Service (NPS). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:00 am
In Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am
Merricks v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:32 am
in Karambelas v Law Off. of Mark S. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:37 pm
Some Californians work for subcontractors who contract with contractors to perform work at construction sites in the state. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:31 am
Dorais and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 1:10 pm
The Supreme Court in Employment Division v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:54 am
The Case: Ridley v. [read post]
