Search for: "People v Then"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 72,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
Law students often find constitutional law interesting, but somewhat challenging. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
There's virtually no physical evidence at all. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:31 pm
One of my (many) flaws as a writer is that I often craft overly long sentences, full of semicolons, dependent clauses, unnecessary adjectives, etc. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
"Yeah, apparently, the feds are soft on kiddie porn. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:09 am
Here's how you get 15 years in prison for your first DUI arrest notwithstanding having no criminal history.Appropriately. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
Michael Vick's got nothing on Robert Brunette:"This macabre case involves appalling animal cruelty. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 1:41 pm
You don't see many convictions like the one in today's opinion, which was for "attempting to take another person from the lawful custody of a peace officer by means of a riot in violation of Penal Code sections 405a and 664. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that it's not a sufficient basis for a new trial, at least given the trial court's evidentiary findings in the present case. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 12:40 pm
The good news for Mr. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
From this opinion:"In July 2008, a jury found defendant guilty of stalking (§ 646.9) which, at the time, constituted a third strike, as he had prior convictions for attempted kidnapping and criminal threats. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Coincidentally, as California is drenched in much-needed rain, the Ninth Circuit issues an opinion that reflects the reality that you don't always need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.The Ninth Circuit issued an opinion back in 2012 written by Judge Randy Smith involving a case in which an AUSA made a new claim in closing argument in order to "sandbag" the defendant, who was never given the chance to respond to this argument. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
It's rare to see a 1-1-1 decision in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
Ah, the exciting life of a capper. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
Here's a classic case of an appeal to which I'd have stipulated error.Alejandro Perez forcibly took a $29 pair of pants from someone else (the victim wasn't wearing them; he had just bought them). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:45 pm
This (among other things) is why you shouldn't have anything to do with a suspended and/or disbarred attorney.It can create a world of trouble. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:17 pm
Because it's the lowest form of juvenile humor, even though it was the only opinion published today by the California Court of Appeal, I promised myself I wasn't going to comment about the caption in this case.But then, on page four, I read this line by Justice Aaron: "Ralph saw Goodwillie put something down his pants. . . . [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 12:09 pm
It pays to testify.Bonilla hires Keyes and Nichols to kill his business partner. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:50 pm
This is amongst the plethora of reasons why it's so nice to read an opinion by Justice Bedsworth. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:39 pm
In 2000, William Morgan brandishes a hammer. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:26 am
Here's what happens in the movies when you're driving your car and come across a group of inner city youths who are playing in the street and blocking your path. [read post]
