Search for: "People v Trump" Results 1861 - 1880 of 4,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm by Katherine Pompilio
   ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Natalie Orpett, Benjamin Wittes and Alan Rozenshtein discuss Trump v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Thousands of ads from Joe Biden’s election campaign and some from President Trump’s have been mistakenly blocked by Facebook. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm by NCC Staff
Earlier this month, in light of a new position taken by the Trump administration, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded – in other words, they sent back to the lower courts – Glouchester County School Board v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:01 pm by NCC Staff
Croix River, Wisconsin-MinnesotaOn March 20, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Murr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:01 pm by NCC Staff
Croix River, Wisconsin-Minnesota On March 20, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Murr v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett’s willingness to look past possible abuse of discretion and violation of due process decried by the dissenting judges echoes Chief Justice John Roberts’s deferential reasoning in Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Martin Kratz
In its decision, Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to pay $148 million to two election workers after he wrongfully alleged that they stole the election from former US President, Donald Trump. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that “[t]he case takes on added significance in light of the Trump administration’s decision to intensify immigration enforcement, with growing numbers of people expected to land in detention awaiting deportation. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
 Specifically, it was found that 119 people had access to the records showing Sir Cliff was under investigation (making identification highly unlikely). [read post]