Search for: "People v. Herring"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 4:32 pm
The Supreme Court handed down its decision in R. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 12:20 pm
To which Davidson responds by defensively saying that the court's essentially not empowered to even question her bills since her charges in those other cases have already been rubber stamped by other judges in other cases. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 10:06 am
Inside the curious case of Dawn Dorland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
” The court brought up US v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:24 am
And every member of the panel -- Judges Callahan, Fernandez and Ikuta -- has his or her own take. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
People v Deprospero, 2011 NY Slip Op 8421, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
StateLatest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
(Id. at p. 671; see also People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:59 pm
And, and that's what people use when they create their own website because they give her the date and they give her [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Any people appearing in the work have rights to their image under privacy laws. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Any people appearing in the work have rights to their image under privacy laws. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:52 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:30 pm
That being said, we wish her good luck. [read post]
