Search for: "People v. Richard" Results 1861 - 1880 of 3,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He turned the project over to Richard Friedman, who didn’t finish it, either. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Warby J (b)  Sir Michael Tugendhat (c)  HHJ Richard Parkes QC (d)  Sir David Eady. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
City of Joliet and Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
Three senators—Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  As fictional TV and movie character, Richard Kimble, might have said, “It’s hard out here for a fugitive. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
A French state watchdog has called for the suspension of a database that could end up holding the biometric details of 60 million people. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am by INFORRM
The Cable, Daily Post Nigeria and People’s Gazette Nigeria covered the story. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
These people are the salt of the earth and there is no gray in their lives. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It “would allow people to collect damages from someone who photographs them in an offensive way during their personal or family time“, reports AP (at Politico). [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]