Search for: "Philip v. State"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Part V (Sections 76 - 78) of the Irish Patents Act 1992 (as amended) permits the use of inventions "for the service of the State". [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Check out New York attorney Philip J. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
It's hard to get an injunction enforcing a covenant not to compete that has a nationwide territory, but the Plaintiff was successful at that in the Middle District's decision last week in Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Philip Morris, Inc., ___ P.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563373 (Nev. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
*This distinction proved critical in resolving Cotter v Garden City Union Free School District.James Cotter, a Garden City UFSD teacher designated "Teacher in Charge" of the Regents examination-grading process, became involved in a physical altercation with a fellow teacher, Philip McCarthy. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Philip Y. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:18 am
Philip Y. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
Philip Morris USA, 346 F.3d 1287, 1300 (11th Cir. 2003). [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:26 am
Philip Morris and Holdgrafer v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
In Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Docket: 08-964 Title: Bilski v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:43 am
Perhaps the most significant criminal case in our collection was United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:32 pm
This question is especially timely in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Philip Morris v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 11:37 pm
Epistar v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:57 am
Docket: 08-853 Title: Zessar v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:08 am
’s Messenger program infringed asserted claims and infringement was wilful: Creative Internet Advertising v Yahoo! [read post]
