Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 7:02 am by Bob Fraser
  The 2008 Superior Court of Quebec decision in Teitelbaum v. 9093-8119 Quebec Inc. and the 1980 Ontario Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:13 am by Maritime Law Staff
Mattis, United States Central Command Commander, said in a statement. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
Sealand mostly just wants to be left alone, in proud independence, with its flag and its coins and its one-of-a-kind royal family. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:15 pm by emp
Coalition politicians claim the bill, expected to get Royal Assent in early 2012, would restrict “state intrusion” in people’s lives and restore “civil liberties”. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:32 am by SHG
RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges federal, state, territorial, tribal, and local courts  to adopt a procedure whereby  a criminal trial court shall, at a reasonable time prior to a criminal trial, disseminate to the prosecution and defense a written checklist delineating in detail the general disclosure obligations of the prosecution under Brady  v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:17 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 (QB) (07 February 2011) Royal Bank of Scotland Invoice Discounting Ltd & Anor v Manuel [2011] EWHC 174 (QB) (04 February 2011) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 179 (QB) (07 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Clarke v Meadus [2011] EWHC 180 (Ch) (07 February 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Cala Homes (South) Ltd v… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am by Larry Ribstein
Crown Royal Ventures, LLC, which I discussed here. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:25 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
" Professor Barta added that "[t]he information about the state of the monuments in the pyramid field came from Egyptian colleagues who had been shot at by gangs of raiders. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm by Jim Walker
  He wrote the amicus curiae briefs for  the cruise industry in the case of Carnival v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The case that I will be discussing in this post is Royal Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
WIPO has a big book that tells its top brass how to address diplomats, ambassadors and members of the Royal Family, but there is no formal precedent that deals with the right way to address an email to a fictional cat. [read post]