Search for: "Ring v. Ring" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 2:32 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
Collins, for example, describes one of her first oral arguments, in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:45 pm by Brad
  They used to be called “evaluators,” but that didn’t quite have the ring to it in court that “expert” does. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
 Of most excitement to the IPKat is a piece by a four-strong team from Allen & Overy on the absurd, unjust and (he hopes) soon to be eradicated principle which the Court of Appeal for England and Wales upheld by a 2-1 majority in Coflexip v Stolt that a patent owner can collect infringement damages even when the patent is subsequently ruled to be invalid. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Instead, the Commission opts for a “more moderate combination” of these approaches by way of: a moderate increase in capital requirements; measures to make a bank’s borrowings more effective as a vehicle for loss absorption; and structural reform through internal ring-fencing within universal banks to insulate UK retail banking services from investment banking risk. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:05 am by Bexis
  We're content with that post stating all the many policy and practical reasons why such consolidations are prejudicial to the defense of cases (which is why plaintiffs seek them and some courts allow them), difficult for jurors to make sense of, and otherwise a bad idea.In that vein we applaud the decision in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:33 pm by J. Benjamin Stevens
  The allegation that the iPhone has encryption weaknesses rings hollow. [read post]