Search for: "Roberts, Board v. State" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 1:28 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Jordan Brunner and Amira Mikhail summarized the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in IRAP v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
§ 7703(b)(1)(A), which provides that “[a] petition from a final decision shall be filed within 60 days after the Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the Board. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Kiran Bhat
United States to the Federal Circuit; the Blog of Legal Times has coverage. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:29 am by Adam Chandler
Howard Wasserman analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Krupski v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:19 am by Jon L. Gelman
This made stopping out-of-state violators working in New Jersey particularly difficult, as they often left the state before the department could enforce state regulations. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which struck down part of a statute that “imposes sentencing enhancements on repeat offenders who commit crimes with guns. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:43 pm
Governor Crist stands as official witness as Shannon Estenoz, South Florida Water Management District Governing Board Vice Chair, and Robert Buker, United States Sugar Corporation President and CEO, sign a “Statement of Principles,” which provides a non-binding framework to acquire property for the protection of Florida's coastal estuaries and the restoration of the Everglades. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:41 am by James Bickford
Many newspapers carried editorials about Snyder v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]