Search for: "STATE v. DANIEL"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 4,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2014, 6:21 am
Here are the materials in Estate of Redd v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
§ 524(a) makes a state-court judgment void ab initio when entered against a debtor whose dischargeable debts had been discharged, or whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine compels federal courts to respect the state-court judgment. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
A Witness Can Change Their Testimony on an Errata Sheet After a DepositionBy Daniel E. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:39 am
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in the copyright case Petrella v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:04 am
Still in play is the state’s unique Martin Act, which allows finding fraud without proof of intent [Nicholas Kusnetz, Inside Climate News] Ninth Circuit panel hears “children’s” climate case, Juliana v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am
” [Daniel Fisher on dismissal of San Francisco, Oakland cases] Rhode Island files first state lawsuit, cheered by mass tort veteran Sen. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 6:34 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 6:34 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
United States, Linda C. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 8:46 am
Daniel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm
Below is the first essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens, by Daniel A. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
Dean v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:38 am
Following up on its story July 17th (see this ILB entry) on Monday's Court of Appeals decision in Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 8:56 am
In Gibb v. [read post]