Search for: "STONE v. STONE" Results 1861 - 1880 of 3,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
”{See also, Russell & Anor v Stone (t/a PSP Consultants) & Ors [2017] EWHC 1555 (TCC)}The said case suggests that English law is not averse to an agreement, which provides even for extension of limitation period since the argument regarding whether the agreement had actually extended the time was considered and rejected not on the basis of whether law allows it but on the basis of construction of contract (see, Paras 46 to 56 of Russell v Stone). [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 5 May it will hear the appeal of Edwards v Kumarasamy regarding whether a landlord under a short lease of a premises was liable for his tenant’s injuries caused by tripping over an uneven paving stone on the main access pathway, under the extended covenant implied into the tenancy by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, s11(1A). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
 Alice v CLS Bank ... could give rise to a restriction on grant and enforcement of business method patents. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
” In Inside Higher Ed, Linda Hirshman suggests that Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
United States Rolling Stone magazine has urged judges to overturn the libel verdict against them over fabricated story about University of Virginia rape. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Michael Kimberly
Marvel Entertainment, LLC Enterprises Inc., that it is “a foundation stone of the rule of law. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Young, 13-95, yet another state-on-top habeas case (this time from the Second Circuit), concerns a whole slew of habeas fun, but in the main asks whether the state can forfeit application of the old rule from Stone v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:02 pm
Taylor, 2008 BCSC 1498 (5 days);Stone v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
In this article, Stone and Evans discuss the landmark rulings in Lange v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:19 am by Cynthia Larose
Aside from understanding the direct implications of how you share customer information with third parties, you should perform your own assessment regarding how third parties could use the limited information that you provide them as a stepping stone to greater access to customer PII. [read post]