Search for: "Smith, Appeal of"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 10,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 pm
Noonan -- For most of the past decade, the Supreme Court has been marking out the metes and bounds of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's execution of the post-grant review provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, particularly with regard to inter partes reviews (see "Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:15 pm
The Senators claim that the legislation is necessary, among other reasons, to prevent undermining the Congressional intent in enacting the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:14 am
My interpretation is validated by looking at the economic content of Peckham’s jurisprudence as a judge in the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 1:51 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has a well-earned and perfectly appropriate problem with perception, and U.S. [read post]
4 May 2014, 11:00 pm
The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Great West and the court of appeals affirmed. [read post]
12 May 2013, 3:30 am
The Second District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Hunt v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 9:15 am
Smith & Nephew. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:08 pm
Smith w/Watford & Hurwitz). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court concluding that postjudgment interest was governed by General Statutes § 37-3a rather than by the contract. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 10:30 am
This shows that a successful publication request to the 9th Circuit is possible.Also, in today's DJ is Appealing Orders Compelling Arbitration Just Got Tougher, by Reed Smith's Paul Fogel and Adam Forest, about MediVas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:47 am
., September 5, 2014) (reversing district court reversal of commissioner's denial of disability benefits) Smith v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:36 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a 129-page ruling in Cambridge Univ. [read post]
4 May 2014, 11:00 pm
The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Great West and the court of appeals affirmed. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm
On October 20, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a “Request for Comments on Discretion To Institute Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board” in the Federal Register. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 9:15 am
Smith & Nephew, 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:19 pm
Smith w/McKeown & Fletcher)(Note: This is an AZ CHU case). [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:41 am
Temkin, No. 12-50103 (8-13-15)(Wardlaw with Berzon and Smith, Chief D.J.). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 1:51 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has a well-earned and perfectly appropriate problem with perception, and U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Nicholas Matich, who is now Principal at McKool Smith, joins the Clause 8 Podcast to share his unique perspective about the ANPRM. [read post]
