Search for: "Smith v. State"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 11,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2020, 9:10 pm
Tomkins, Smith & Tomkins, One Lakeview Place, Nashville, TN. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
In C.F. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm
Smith (Disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlEstate of Ducheneaux v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:47 pm
Smith v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:30 am
Smith, No. 09-2324 (6th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:26 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
New York also cited concerns voiced by several federalism scholars who argued that this type of subpoena can put state sovereignty at risk, and it may disrupt an ongoing enforcement matter.Separately, Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh announced that 15 state attorneys general sent a letter to Chairman Smith urging him to withdraw subpoena requests made to New York and Massachusetts. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 5:46 pm
After an incredibly busy week, I finally had time today to read carefully Judge Aileen Cannon's opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm
[The state cannot grant medical exemptions without also granting religious exemptions. ] In Fulton, the Court declined to overrule Smith. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself: “If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
The panel consists of Judges Kozinski, Fernandez and Randy Smith. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:11 am
Smith should be revisited? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
In Stern v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:02 am
And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
Smith, 2018 U.S. [read post]
