Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1861 - 1880 of 15,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Here's the key language from the article:In the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was André-Bélisle c. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:56 pm by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
Regarding Rule 23(c)(4), which states that “[w]hen appropriate, an action may be brought or maintained as a class action with respect to particular issues,” the Court agreed with AT&T’s position. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletin has a post on the Canadian Government’s proposed “Online Streaming Act” (Bill C-11). [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 8:26 am by Russell Knight
During the course of a custody battle, a parent may want to know their child’s exact mental state in order to argue that the child should spend more time with them and less time with the other parent. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am by Riana Harvey
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The article’s authors are based in the UK and so the article is written from a UK perspective, but many of the article’s insights are largely applicable in the US as well. [read post]