Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 1861 - 1880
of 6,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Davis, 2019 Pa. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:06 am
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
See Davis v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 6:53 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:35 pm
” Finally, in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:19 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 9:58 am
A divided Supreme Court issued an important opinion today, Maryland v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:36 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:14 am
Under the correct standard, which is set out in State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
United States (11-597). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:42 am
[Post by Venkat] Lane v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
Whether you're convicted of murder, and thus spend most or all of the rest of your life in prison, should not depend on which particular appellate panel you happen to draw.The question presented is the required mental state for a murder conviction when you commit an assault. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
There's a lot about this Ninth Circuit opinion that's not surprising at all.It's a lawsuit brought by some gun owners in California who don't like that the Legislature recently passed a law that says that identifying information about who has a concealed carry permit or who buys various ammunition -- which is already collected by the state and disseminated to a plethora of law enforcement officials -- also gets to be used (though kept confidential) by specific academic… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 6:36 am
Davies v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Part Two detailed the line of Supreme Court precedent going back more than a century rejecting ISL premises, at least in federal election contexts (as distinguished from other places the Constitution refers to state “legislatures”), including Davis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
Davis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:06 am
(Haft v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 6:56 am
The PAC addresses Baker v. [read post]