Search for: "State v. District Court"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 72,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
On November 12, 2010, the Second District (Division 5), in Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores, __ Cal.App. 4th __ (2010), overturned a trial court order dismissing a PAGA claim predicated upon Wage Order 7’s “suitable seating” requirement. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm
District Court in Arizona denied the motion to dismiss by five gun dealers. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm
District Court in Arizona denied the motion to dismiss by five gun dealers. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Imburgia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:01 pm
The United States Court of Federal Claims recently issued its decision in the case of Klamath Irrigation v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 10:15 am
Court, MD Florida 2014 More Blogs: Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeals Holds Man Must Litigate Injury Case Separately From Bad-Faith Insurance Claim: GEICO Casualty Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
The district court jury returned a verdict of willful infringement and awarded damages totaling $90 million. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
The district court jury returned a verdict of willful infringement and awarded damages totaling $90 million. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:15 pm
Sec’y, Dept. of Corrections, No. 11-14498, a case where the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida found that Florida’s death penalty statute violated Ring v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:00 pm
On January 12, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Kloeckner v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance… [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:00 am
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, 141 S. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:00 am
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, 141 S. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Rooker-Feldman only applies when you're a "state court loser," which is why it doesn't apply in this case.The case is Green v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Puglisi v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:14 pm
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the case of HEAL Utah v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
The court stated, “Regence appears to have misunderstood the standard. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm
Since my previous post on the United States Supreme Court case of Maples v. [read post]
