Search for: "State v. Graves" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Aleksovski (1999), suggested that the humiliating or degrading treatment must have caused “lasting suffering” to the victim, the trial chamber decision in a later case, Prosecutor v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
To be sure, there are passages in which the majority appears motivated by justified outrage that the Sacklers get to keep billions of dollars--which is indeed, a grave injustice. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am by Madeleine Reardon, 1 Kings Bench Walk.
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the… [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 7:27 am by Phil Dixon
Coffey worked for former Granville County Sheriff Brindell Wilkins, who was also charged with felony offenses and whose convictions were also set aside in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:49 pm by Lovechilde
Foreign plaintiffs have used the ATS to accuse corporations of committing grave human rights abuses, including genocide, war crimes, and forced labor. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm by admin
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 1:41 am by INFORRM
US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard expressed “grave concern,” calling the move a violation of Americans’ privacy and launching an investigation into the matter. [read post]