Search for: "State v. Levy"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
United States,66 Buff. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
The $25,000 fine issued by the court in that case, known as R. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:04 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:18 am
Here’s a story about this very thing from California, from Borgstrom v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:00 am
States: "The country's need for an IPR system was more in response to the needs of sustainable development than to pressure from other countrie" (China Hearsay), Update on the Alibaba Chinese Trademark war, (IPDragon),DenmarkDenmark's version of the RIAA (or CRIA) is considering a proposal to allow for unlimited, legalized music downloads in return for a monthly fee levied by ISPs (Michael Geist), EuropeMicrosoft settles its dispute with the EU and agreed not to… [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 7:57 pm
"Nollan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
There are many areas of the law, from bankruptcy to patents to criminal justice, where they can show they are not engaged in the Red Team v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:14 am
There is one potential argument that you can make to obtain compensation – that you are an “employee” under state law. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
As the late Edward Levi wrote in similar amicus in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:04 am
In a decision that recognizes the importance of fostering informal mentorship, the Ontario Superior Court held (in 1623242 Ontario Inc. v Great Lakes Copper Inc., 2014 ONSC 782 (CanLII) ) that a lawyer who provides a general opinion about the state of the law to a colleague without being privy to the specific details of the colleague’s case or the identity of his or her client and is later retained by a client opposed in interest to the colleague’s client is not thereby… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:59 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 10:46 am
Today, in Consumers' Research v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Thе IRS wіll fіnd аll mеаnѕ tо gеt back whаt you оwе, аnd this mау involve ѕеvеrаl реnаltіеѕ, levies, аnd interests thаt could leave уоu fіnаnсіаllу drаіnеd. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
This illustrates one of the shortcomings of capital stock taxes: they are levied without regard to ability to pay, imposing burdens even when a business is losing money. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
