Search for: "State v. Little Bear" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 3:32 am
Professor Koh argues that the "sole organ" doctrine has taken a drubbing, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.But I am not so sure.For one thing, even if the Supreme Court is eager for Congress to reassert its prerogatives, as Justice Breyer's Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to the court, there is little doubt that the plaintiffs heroin habit qualifies as a specific immoral, vicious and/or criminal act which could have a bearing on the plaintiff's credibility. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to the court, there is little doubt that the plaintiffs heroin habit qualifies as a specific immoral, vicious and/or criminal act which could have a bearing on the plaintiff's credibility. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:50 am
It looks like low value settlements got just a little bit harder to defend yesterday when the Second District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's good faith settlement finding in  Long Beach Memorial Medical Center v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:21 pm
The only judge to review the rules so far, Judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. sitting in the Northern District of New York in Alexander v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Familiar examples, to name just a few, include Justice Harlan's famous dissenting opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
Instead of deciding that there should be a statutory compensation scheme backed by the state (as per a very limited English version) , the law decided that pleural plaques amounted to bodily injury. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Adkins was important in the development of American feminisms, however, the case tells us very little about the [read post]
7 May 2014, 1:00 pm
  The court appears to start down the right path, but then gets tripped up by three little letters. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Consider three cases decided earlier this year.In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]